Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of automation etiquette and pedigree on trust and dependence. Participants (N = 60) performed a simulated luggage-screening task while interacting with an imperfect automated aid that varied in pedigree (expert vs. novice) and etiquette (polite feedback vs. neutral feedback vs. rude feedback). Trust, perceived reliability, and dependence on the automated aid were measured. Results indicated that participants perceived the polite system as being more reliable and trustworthy than the rude system. Moreover, compliance varied as a function of etiquette and pedigree. Participants complied less often with the rude expert system than the rude novice system. These findings support theoretical work that suggests surface level features of automation can influence trust and trust related behaviors. Further research is warranted to determine how mimicking human communication styles can further influence human interaction with automation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
