Abstract
Alternative theories of state development proposed by Cartteiro (1970) and Wilier (1977) are presented and discussed briefly. Each is considered in terms of its applicability to the development of the Hittite Empire of ancient Turkey. It is concluded that Miller's framework, which allows a central role to factors external to the prevailing system, is more useful for the analysis of the case of the Hittite state and, in general, may have greater scope and predictive ability.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
