Abstract

We have already seen that West Indians were not preeminent amongst the Goose Creek men. Even less evidence exists to support the characterization of the “Barbadian” party (in whatever incarnation) as “Anglican.” In the first place, Carolina—uniquely in the annals of English colonization in North America—came into being without a recorded clerical presence or even any religious overtones. We find no John Winthrop, John Cotton, Thomas Hooker, Roger Williams, Fr. John White, S.J., or William Penn at Ashley River and no John Donne gave a sermon at Paul’s Cross to godspeed settlers; indeed, we find no clergyman recorded at all in the colony prior to 1695.152 Ashley’s lack of enthusiasm for the established church and the corresponding official countenancing of toleration undoubtedly translated into proprietary hesitation (or even deliberate omission) to deal with their province’s religious affairs.KeywordsFundamental ConstitutionLand GrantIndian AffairProprietary TradeOfficial CountenanceThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.