Abstract
In June 1990, the U.S. Supreme Court decided its first right-to-die case, Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Writing under the auspices of the American Medical Association's Office of the General Counsel, Orentlicher sumarizes the Court's holdings in Cruzan, draws several inferences from the decision about the right to refuse medical treatment, and discusses Cruzan's implications for physicians and patients. Orentlicher concludes that while the Court "eschewed an expansive construction of the right to refuse medical treatment, its decision...enlarged the right in many respects without restricting it in other respects... In any situation in which withdrawal of treatment was permissible before the Cruzan case, withdrawal is permissible now...in some situations in which withdrawal was not permissible before the Cruzan case, withdrawal is permissible now."
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.