Abstract

This paper examines recent attempts by the state to restructure welfare organizations by the introduction of market rationality and criteria into the NHS. The paper consists of two case studies of the implementation of recent government policies. The first case study discusses the initial effects of the introduction of new management arrangements based on private sector principles (the Griffiths Report), and the second examines the political imposition of a programme of contracting out ancillary services in the NHS. Both case studies draw on research carried out by the author in two district health authorities. The case studies illustrate the nature of the `political contingencies' operating on managers, workers and trade unions within the NHS. It is argued that attempts to introduce forms of market rationality in the NHS have undermined and obscured the purposes of state welfare work and have produced a number of tensions and problems for managers which have further to be resolved. Evidence from the research also suggests that these recent policies have begun to change the terms, conditions and security of employment for both general managers and ancillary workers.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.