The response of epibenthic rotifers and microcrustacean communities to flow manipulations in lowland rivers

Abstract

Non-flowing, slackwater habitats in lowland rivers support diverse and abundant benthic microfaunal communities; however, there is little information on how these communities respond to changes in hydrology. In this study, we tested two hypotheses: (1) microfaunal richness and density will be higher in slackwater habitats compared to flowing habitats; (2) altering the hydrology of a habitat will result in changes in the richness and density of microfauna over time so that communities will become similar to those found in a habitat with the same flow characteristics. Flowing and slackwater habitats were manipulated by constructing barriers to redirect flows, either away from flowing habitats and creating slackwater habitats, or towards a slackwater creating a flowing habitat. The resultant epibenthic microfaunal communities were compared to those in unmodified slackwaters and flowing habitats. Over a 4-month period, epibenthic microfaunal samples were collected from the four experimental treatments. Analysis of variance indicates that there was no difference in rotifer richness or abundance between habitat types, but significant differences in the richness and abundance of microcrustacean occurred with higher richness and densities occurring in the slackwater habitats compared to flowing habitats. Within four weeks of the treatments being applied, there was little difference in the microfaunal communities between the natural and created flowing habitats or between the natural and created slackwater habitats. As the hydrology of a river varies, slackwater habitats will be scoured and new habitats created. The microfauna populations associated with these habitats appear to have strategies that enable them to cope with the disturbance and to recolonise newly created slackwater areas.