Abstract
This article serves a twofold objective: on the one hand, it questions the alleged universality of much of the current resemiotization of scientific content into graphical abstracts and diagnoses the major causes of ambiguity and misinterpretation. On the other, it intends to reunite the long-dissociated disciplines of Semiotics and Linguistics. Over 70 samples reported to be difficult to interpret by scholarly science bloggers and published in Q1 journals on Physics, Chemistry, Chemical Physics and Physical Chemistry from January 2022 to June 2023 are analysed regarding the five contexts common to Semiotics and Linguistics: situational, actional, psychological, existential and cotextual. Specifically, the focus is set on major interpretive hurdles such as unfamiliar cotexts, jocular overtones, narrative occlusion, cognitive overload, discursive scope, interdiscursivity, and intertextuality. Findings suggest that most causes for misinterpretation seem to derive from compositional strategies and the choice of registers and metaphorical scenarios. A proposal of basic author-oriented semiotics in the form of self-reflection questions is finally provided.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
