Abstract
Creating a vital and lively urban environment is an inherent requirement of urban sustainable development, and understanding urban vibrancy is helpful for urban development policy making. The urban vibrancy theory needs more empirical supplementation and more evidence for the effect of the built environment on urban vibrancy. We use multisource urban spatial information data, including real-time population distribution (RPD) data and small catering business (SCB) data; quantitatively measure urban vibrancy; and build a comparative framework to explore the effect of the built environment on the urban vibrancy of a northwestern emerging city in China. The results demonstrate that the two urban vibrancy metrics present a spatial distribution pattern that is high in the south and low in the north areas of the city with significant spatial aggregation. Land-use intensity and diversity have strong positive effects on urban vibrancy but present a different pattern of effects on the two vibrancy measures. The influences on urban vibrancy of distance to the district center and distance to the nearest commercial complex are spatially complementary in the study area, and the effect of accessibility factors is weak. Our findings suggest that a somewhat cautious approach is required in the application of these classical planning theories to Urumqi.
Highlights
Urban studies always focus on temporal and spatial relationships between human activities and urban spatial entities
The results of the stepwise regression showed that the nine elements of the built environment are correlated with the urban vibrancy of Urumqi, and the significance of all factors is at the level of 0.05
mixed use (MU), mean distance from the district center (Mdis_DC), Mdis_NCC and floor-area ratio (FAR) are significantly associated with the two derived vibrancy results
Summary
Urban studies always focus on temporal and spatial relationships between human activities and urban spatial entities. The challenge of urban expansion and pressure of urban renewal have led to critical reflections on urban planning and design. In the 1960s, from the social needs perspective, Jacobs criticized the urban design principle, which was not concerned with the natural features of cities, and presented the concepts of urban diversity and urban vibrancy [1]. As an important part of urban studies, urban vibrancy reflects human activities and human interactions with cities [3]. Urban vibrancy has been regarded as an essential element of urban quality of life that is connected with urban functions, urban form and socioeconomic activities [4,5,6]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International journal of environmental research and public health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.