Abstract
This article analyses the influence of regulations and institutions on the relationship between market concentration and bank charter value by applying a simultaneous equations model to a sample of 276 banks in 27 countries. Results highlight that the role of the structure–conduct–performance (SCP) and the efficient-structure (EFS) hypotheses in explaining a positive relationship between bank charter value and market concentration depends on a country's regulatory and institutional set-up. The validity of EFS forecasts compared to SCP forecasts increases in line with the quality of the legal environment and enforceability of contracts, with the increased weight of the markets compared to banks and with the share of banking assets held by banks that are majority-owned by foreign owners and by the government. In contrast, tighter legal restrictions on the activities banks are allowed to pursue limit the validity of both the EFS and SCP hypotheses.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
