The rationing of health care: should Oregon be transported to Australia?

Abstract

The Oregon Plan is an ambitious attempt to address the widespread problem in the United States of a growing number of individuals who are without private health insurance and are not eligible for federal assistance programs. Its aim is to provide universal access for all Oregonians, without increasing total health care expenditure, by restricting the cover of some treatments. It has aroused interest in Australia and elsewhere. The appeal of the Oregon Plan lies in its explicit approach to rationing, in community participation in setting priorities, and the use of a cost-effectiveness framework. This paper describes the beginnings and the development of the Oregon Plan, and compares the actual development of the Plan with the rhetoric. There is a gap between the rhetoric of the Plan and its reality. The Oregon plan should be considered in the context of the United States health care system. We compare the American problems with those facing the Australian health care system and conclude that the answer to the question of whether Oregon should be transported to Australia is no. Nevertheless there are elements of the rhetoric of the Plan which could be applied in rationing health care in Australia.