Abstract
In this article I evaluate the question of disarmament in Brazil. Specifically, I attempt to examine a parliamentarian's position with regard to the voting that authorized the referendum dealing with the prohibition of the sale of firearms and munitions in the country. I discovered that a vote in favor of the control of firearms can be mainly explained by a parliamentarian's ideological/party position, independent of the Executive branch's opinion. The vote can also be explained by a parliamentarian's individual characteristics, such as profession, educational background and the region of origin. The tendency to vote against firearms control tends to be more closely related to certain aspects such as: affiliation to right-wing parties, having a military background, coming from rural areas or states that border other South American countries, having a lower educational background, and being financed by the arms industry. Now parliamentarians that are affiliated with center or left wing parties and have a higher educational background tended to vote in favor of firearms control. Gender and religion were not important variables in explaining a parliamentarian's position with regard to the issue at hand.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.