Abstract

This paper is concerned with what I call the “quantitative approach” to the “transformation problem” of chapter 9 of volume 3 of capital, very widespread in the literature. I call it so because it conceives the “transformation of value into competitive price” as a relationship between quantities of labor-value and quantities of money price. Such a conception of the transformation of value into competitive price presupposes that value has quantitative determination. My central contention in this paper is that this presupposition contradicts Marx's idea that labor is the substance or immanent measure of value. In Marx, labor cannot be money, which means that value as such does not have a quantitative determination apart from price expressed in some product of labor. Accordingly, there are no such things as “labor-values” and the transformation of value into competitive price does not contradict the determination of value by labor or Marx's “law of exchange”: it is the process through which labor-value becomes objectified as money price in such a way as to equalize the profit rate of capitals of a nonuniform composition. With the “transformation” of value into competitive price, Marx refutes Ricardo's refutation of the labor theory of value in principles (chap. 1, sec. 4).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.