Abstract
Specific environmental statements concerning developments of clinical waste incinerators in the UK were identified. The authors of these statements were surveyed regarding their perception of the quality of the statement, and similarly the relevant planning authority was surveyed for its opinions on the statement. These subjective evaluations were compared with the results of an objective assessment of the statements' quality. This analysis highlighted several differences between the authors and planners in their perception of statement quality, and also revealed the poor quality of several of the statements. Improved communication and training are suggested as a means of improving the quality of the EIA process.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
