Abstract

BackgroundHigh-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the most accepted imaging tool for the detection, characterization, and monitoring of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). The correct interpretation of HRCT findings still represents often a problem for the radiologists since there is wide interobserver variability. Therefore, a quantitative and noninvasive imaging method able to permit an accurate assessment of ILD is highly desirable. The purpose of this study is to compare the visual method and quantitative CT histogram in the evaluation of ILDs and to identify the best quantitative parameter in the prediction of severity of ILDs.ResultsThere is a correlation between the HRCT score by the qualitative method and CT histogram parameters by the quantitative method in the evaluation of ILDs. Total lung volume inspiratory, mean lung density expiratory, and high attenuation area expiratory showed a significant correlation with the HRCT score.ConclusionThe single best predictor of fibrosis severity in interstitial lung disease is HAAs % expiratory.

Highlights

  • High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the most accepted imaging tool for the detection, characterization, and monitoring of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs)

  • We used Total lung volume (TLV), mean lung density (MLD) (HU), high attenuation areas (HAAs) %, and low attenuation areas (LAAs) % as histogram parameters during inspiratory and expiratory multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) as well as HRCT score as the visual-based method in the evaluation of ILDs according to Warrick et al [9]

  • Mean lung density (MLD) inspiratory in ILDs in this study showed no significant correlation with fibrosis score; this agreed with Tanizawa et al [13] who stated that MLD (HU) inspiratory failed to correlate with fibrosis score

Read more

Summary

Introduction

High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the most accepted imaging tool for the detection, characterization, and monitoring of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). The purpose of this study is to compare the visual method and quantitative CT histogram in the evaluation of ILDs and to identify the best quantitative parameter in the prediction of severity of ILDs. Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are considered as a group of diseases with different etiology and features [1]. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the most accepted imaging tool for the detection, characterization, and monitoring of ILD [2,3,4,5,6]. Compared to the conventional visual interpretation of HRCT lung findings, the automatic computer-based assessment may reveal better improvement in the objectivity, sensitivity, and repeatability of quantitative changes in the lung features [10].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.