Abstract

The characteristics of blunt traumatic supratentorial cranial bleed (STCB) types have not been directly compared. The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) 2014 was queried for adults with an isolated single STCB n = 57,278. Patients were grouped by STCB categories: subdural (SDH), subarachnoid (SAH), epidural (EDH), intraparenchymal (IPH), and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). Frequency, demographics, clinical characteristics, procedures, and outcomes were compared among groups. SDH was the most common STCB (53%) and occurred mostly in elderly patients after a fall (78%), 30% underwent craniotomy and their mortality was 7%. SAH occurred in 32% of patients and carried the lowest mortality (3%). SAH were least likely to have a severe brain injury (7%), and had the lowest Injury Severity Score (ISS, median 8) and complication rate (1%), as well as the shortest hospital length of stay (HLOS, 4.6 ± 6.4 days). EDH was uncommon (2%), occurred in younger patients (median 35 years), and had the highest percentage of traffic related injuries (28%). While EDH patients presented with the poorest neurological status (16% Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8, ISS median 18) and were operated on more than any other STCB type (51%), their mortality was lower (4%) and they had the highest discharge to home rate (71%). IVH was the least common (2%), but most lethal (9%) STCB type. These patients had the highest HLOS and intensive care unit LOS, and the lowest craniotomy rate (21%). STCB types have different clinical course, and outcomes. Understanding these differences can be useful in managing patients with STB.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.