Abstract

The use of tax treaties to obtain Double Non-Taxation for multinational firms as part of aggressive tax avoidance planning is not always ethical conduct for U.S. tax professionals. Under the guidance of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), international standards of tax treaty practice are trending toward substantive methods of interpretation more typical of U.S. tax treaty drafting and interpretation. In a growing number of cases, the use of formalist planning techniques that apply tax treaties without a substantive review may not constitute ethical attorney conduct. This paper explains in detail the interpretational methods underlying the use of tax treaties to obtain Double Non-Taxation. Because tax treaty interpretation is an art and not a science, wide discretion is available to the tax planner. Yet, there are ethical boundaries in interpreting tax treaties to achieve Double Non-Taxation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.