Abstract

This chapter has outlined some of the issues involved in the evaluation of the private finance initiative (PFI) experience in the United Kingdom (UK). The author argued that if PFI does give rise to additional investment, then that comes not from finding some additional sources of finance but rather through a political decision which views equivalent expenditures on PFI and on “conventional” public sector investment from a different accounting perspective. Further, the cost of finance under PFI is likely to be greater than it is under “conventional” public investment. This means that the cost in terms of public expenditure of PFI is significantly greater than “conventional” public investment. The claimed efficiency gains of PFI over “conventional” public investment appear to arise predominantly from the pricing of risk in the public sector comparator (PSC) and from the perceived overrun of costs under “conventional” public investment.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.