Abstract
Generally, evidence of bad character of a person especially accused in a case cannot be tendered as it is inadmissible. However, there are few situations where the evidence of bad character may be adduced as relevant in a case if it is provided under the ambit of Evidence Law. Among others, similar fact evidence may be given in a case although it will amount to a bad character of the accused. This article addresses the issue of relevancy of similar fact evidence in Malaysia by referring to the provisions under the Evidence Act 1950 and the decided cases. This article further explains the factors to be considered by the courts before admitting similar fact evidence against the accused in Malaysia. The article found that “striking similarity” which has been used as a main component in admitting similar fact evidence in Malaysia has been relaxed by the Malaysian apex court in the case of Public Prosecutor v Mohamad Roslan bin Desa. The article also found that though the Evidence Act 1950 does not contain any direct provisions relating to similar fact evidence, sections 14 and 15 have been used as similar fact provisions in Malaysia. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4p539
Highlights
The general principle in the law of evidence is that all evidence of res inter alios acta nocere non debet are inadmissible (Halsbury’s Laws of Malaysia, 2011, para [500.093]-[500.098])
The research is pure legal research whereby it focuses on the relevancy and admissibility of similar fact evidence in Malaysia
Based on the explanation above, it is submitted that similar fact evidenve is admissible under the Malaysian Evidence Law but none of the provisions in the Malaysian Evidence Act 1950 directly address the relevancy of similar fact
Summary
The general principle in the law of evidence is that all evidence of res inter alios acta nocere non debet are inadmissible (Halsbury’s Laws of Malaysia, 2011, para [500.093]-[500.098]). This Latin maxim means that a transaction between strangers ought not to injure another party; evidence given in other cause between other parties cannot be made available to the present cause because they have nothing to do with the present dispute There are, exceptions to the general rule which commonly referred to as ‘similar fact evidence’ under the Evidence Act 1950 (Act 56)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
