Abstract
This paper argues that bioethics needs to focus more centrally on political and social practices that contribute to death, disease, or disability. A broader vision would help bioethicists show why attacking the root causes of premature death and physical suffering should have priority over contemplating the pros and cons of expensive, risky, high-tech solutions that often address problems after they have developed. Only this approach is consistent with bioethicists’ professed values, such as the wrongness of hastening patients’ deaths without their consent. This approach puts corporate and governmental decision-making at the center of moral inquiry, as they determine economic, environmental, and occupational conditions that are a major source of death, disease, and disability. However, there are significant cultural and institutional obstacles to this kind of bioethics.Key WordsDeathpremature deathphysical suffering and ethicsinformed consentmoral decision-making in bioethics
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.