Abstract
The use of relative abundances of filter-feeding platycopid ostracods in estimating past levels of dissolved oxygen in the ocean (the “Platycopid Signal Hypothesis”) is examined, paying particular attention to evidence from faunistic, biological and ecological studies. The degree of support for the hypothesis has been overstated; available data on ostracod depth distribution show that previous claims for platycopid dominance in the Oxygen Minimum Zone in different oceanic regions are misleading and based on only a few studies. Observations and experimental studies on living platycopids are limited in scope and should be treated with caution. We conclude that previously published and widely applied calibrations of platycopid abundance against dissolved oxygen levels are inadequately justified by the available data. Any further application of the Platycopid Signal technique should necessarily address these criticisms.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
