Abstract
ABSTRACT This research commentary integrates five decades of research by Dr Shelby D. Hunt (1939–2022) on the philosophy of science as it relates to the Hunt–Vitell (H-V) model for making decisions that involve ethical content and Scientific Realism. The author outlines seven misunderstandings of why relativism remains a popular philosophy despite its incoherence. This includes clarification on distinguishing similar-sounding labels for methods (such as ‘phenomenological research’ or ‘empirical research’) with other labels in philosophical epistemology (such as ‘phenomenology’ or ‘empiricism’) that are very different things. It also includes how one can embrace a general relativity concept ‘that something is relative to something else’ without embracing the problematic non-evaluation thesis of relativism that results in nihilism and its associated harmful effects for ethical decision-making. The author outlines several application questions for future research opportunities that could advance theory, practice, and society.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
