Abstract

What prompts radical opposition leaders to revise or abandon their ultimate goals and accommodate themselves to the give and take of democratic politics? This question has been explored largely by scholars seeking to explain the historic deradicalization of the left in western Europe and Latin America. According to a number of influential studies, radical socialist leaders and parties moderated their agendas in order to exploit the new opportunities for electoral participation created by democratization. Yet recent change in the ideological positions staked out by some leaders in Egypt's Islamic movement reveals that moderation can also occur in the absence of democratization. More limited institutional openings can be sufficient to generate strategic incentives for moderation and create opportunities for political learning, or experience-driven change in individual leaders' core values and beliefs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.