Abstract

Given relatively prime positive integers $a_1,\ldots,a_n$, the Frobenius number is the largest integer that cannot be written as a nonnegative integer combination of the $a_i$. We examine the parametric version of this problem: given $a_i=a_i(t)$ as functions of $t$, compute the Frobenius number as a function of $t$. A function $f:\mathbb{Z}_+\rightarrow\mathbb{Z}$ is a quasi-polynomial if there exists a period $m$ and polynomials $f_0,\ldots,f_{m-1}$ such that $f(t)=f_{t\bmod m}(t)$ for all $t$. We conjecture that, if the $a_i(t)$ are polynomials (or quasi-polynomials) in $t$, then the Frobenius number agrees with a quasi-polynomial, for sufficiently large $t$. We prove this in the case where the $a_i(t)$ are linear functions, and also prove it in the case where $n$ (the number of generators) is at most 3.

Highlights

  • Given positive integers ai, 1 i n, let a1, . . . , an =n piai pi ∈ Z 0 i=1 be the semigroup generated by the ai

  • Given relatively prime positive integers a1, . . . , an, the Frobenius number is the largest integer that cannot be written as a nonnegative integer combination of the ai

  • We examine the parametric version of this problem: given ai = ai(t) as functions of t, compute the Frobenius number as a function of t

Read more

Summary

Introduction

N piai pi ∈ Z 0 i=1 be the semigroup generated by the ai. If the ai are relatively prime, define the Frobenius number F (a1, . . . , an) to be the largest integer not in a1, . . . , an. Woods proved [11] that any example over the integers defined with linear inequalities, boolean operations (and, or, not), and quantifiers (∀, ∃) has this quasi-polynomial behavior. This is true even if there is more than one parameter; for example,. This is a 2-dimensional triangle in R3; as t changes, this triangle “twists” (the normal vector changes) Examples such as this were categorized in [10] as “unreasonable”, though they are conjectured to still lead to eventual quasi-polynomial behavior. Using the proof of Theorem 1.2, we can prove that there is quasi-polynomial behavior with period M 2 Such a result holds in greater generality: Corollary 1.4.

An Example
Proofs of Lemmas

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.