Abstract

The essay begins by examining how much of feminist theory today remains tethered to “the skeptical problematic.” I argue that this tethering entangles feminists in unnecessary epistemological questions, ones which import into feminist theory an impulse to sovereignty and totalizing thinking. The cost of this impulse is the reduction of alterity into an epistemological schema of difference, as well as an obscuring of the political practices by which women affirm political freedom and ethical responsibility. Navigating various feminist authors with the critical lens of Emmanuel Levinas, I attempt to recuperate and refigure skepticism as an ethical phenomenon (rather than simply an epistemological problem), one which can serve as an opening for innovative forms of feminist praxis that affirm, rather than cover over, the alterity of the Other. I conclude by specifying a form of praxis that exemplifies the figuring of skepticism as an ethical issue by turning towards the practice of “entrustment” articulated by the Milan Women’s Bookstore Collective.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.