Abstract
There are differences in morphology and latency between averaged lambda waves and averaged pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (VEPs). Averaging of lambda potentials recorded from OzFz, OzCz and OzPz was synchronised from various points in the electro-oculogram (EOG) wave form, during targeted saccadic eye movements across a checkerboard which was subsequently used for pattern reversal VEPs. EOG and blinks (electrical and infra-red) were recorded and also averaged from eye movements performed in darkness. The initial, prominent, negative component in the averaged lambda wave was shown to be due to eye blink artefact caused by a partial lowering of the upper lid, each blink coinciding with every saccadic eye movement which elicited a lambda wave when scanning the pattern but not when the eye moved in darkness.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
