Abstract
The concept of maximizing bone removal along the skull base has been advocated to expand the operative space for large, firm, and encasing ventral and ventrolateral skull base tumors. However, indications for the use of such osteotomies have not been well defined. The improved maneuverability and enhanced extent of expansion of the operative corridor via the skull base approaches compared to those of standard craniotomies have been based on cadaveric studies that might not simulate the operative environment realistically. Bony removal alone is not adequate to protect neurovascular structures, and strategic use of dynamic retraction and innovative operative routes are some of the other factors that contribute to successful microsurgery. In this analysis, the more discriminate indications and modified techniques for orbitozygomatic osteotomy are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
