THE ONE HEALTH APPROACH IN RABIES CONTROL THROUGH VACCINATION AND EDUCATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Rabies is one of the world's most fatal zoonotic diseases, with a case fatality rate of nearly 100% if post-exposure prophylaxis is not administered promptly. In Indonesia, rabies remains endemic in several regions, primarily transmitted through dog bites. The main challenges in its control include low animal vaccination coverage, limited public awareness, and suboptimal intersectoral coordination. This systematic review aims to analyze the effectiveness of the One Health approach in rabies control, specifically through vaccination and community education strategies. The Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method was employed by collecting and analyzing articles from databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect published within the last 10 years. The One Health concept emphasizes integrated collaboration between the human health, animal health, and environmental sectors. The findings indicate that mass vaccination of rabies reservoir animals with a minimum of 70% annual coverage, combined with participatory, community-based education programs, significantly increases public knowledge and reduces transmission rates. Furthermore, the establishment of cross-sectoral coordination teams and community empowerment in health promotion efforts have proven effective in supporting sustainable rabies control. In conclusion, the One Health approach is a key strategy for achieving the global goal of eliminating dog-mediated human rabies by 2030, as outlined in the “Zero by 30” initiative.
- Research Article
4
- 10.14202/ijoh.2023.166-171
- Dec 1, 2023
- International Journal of One Health
Background and Aim: Human antibiotic formulations in animal feed for therapeutic and non-therapeutic purposes have contributed to antimicrobial resistance worldwide; however, little evidence is available in low- and middle-income countries. We aimed to generate evidence of antibiotic use across the human and animal health sectors by investigating the overlap in antibiotic use in community settings in rural blocks of Pune District, India, following the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) classification. Materials and Methods: An exploratory pilot study using a cross-sectional design in two randomly selected rural blocks of the Pune district included 138 interviews with general physicians (GPs, n = 62), pharmacists (n = 60), and veterinary practitioners (n = 16) using semi-structured interview schedules and the WHO AWaRe classification. IBM-Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 21.0 software was used for descriptive statistics and to calculate the proportions of the different antibiotic groups. The WHO AWaRe classification was used to describe antibiotic use by the study participants and to assess the overlap in antibiotic use. Results: Our study provides evidence of an overlap in human and animal antibiotic use in rural community settings across the human and animal health sectors. Amoxicillin (access group), penicillin (access group), and ofloxacin (watch group) were used in both human and animal health. Amoxicillin and penicillin were used to treat common bacterial infections, ofloxacin was used to treat skin infections in humans and animals, and ofloxacin was used to treat pneumonia in animals and urinary bladder infections in humans. In contrast, azithromycin (watch group), cefixime (watch group), and amoxicillin (Access Group), with or without other antibiotics, were the most commonly used antibiotics by GPs in humans. Conclusion: We confirmed the overlap in antibiotic use across the human and animal health sectors in rural community settings, suggesting the need for interventions following the One Health approach. Further, research is required to assess the patterns of this overlap, as well as behavior, knowledge, and potential solutions to help avoid this overlap and prevent the rampant use of antibiotics in the animal and human health sectors in rural community settings. Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, antibiotics use, overlap, rural India, WHO AWaRe.
- Research Article
34
- 10.1186/s12889-020-8319-3
- Feb 11, 2020
- BMC Public Health
BackgroundThe One Health concept promotes the enhancement of human, animal and ecosystem health through multi-sectorial governance support and policies to combat health security threats. In Vietnam, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in animal and human health settings poses a significant threat, but one that could be minimised by adopting a One Health approach to AMR surveillance. To advance understanding of the willingness and abilities of the human and animal health sectors to undertake investigations of AMR with a One Health approach, we explored the perceptions and experiences of those tasked with investigating AMR in Vietnam, and the benefits a multi-sectorial approach offers.MethodsThis study used qualitative methodology to provide key informants’ perspectives from the animal and human health sectors. Two scenarios of food-borne AMR bacteria found within the pork value chain were used as case studies to investigate challenges and opportunities for improving collaboration across different stakeholders and to understand benefits offered by a One Health approach surveillance system. Fifteen semi-structured interviews with 11 participants from the animal and six from the human health sectors at the central level in Hanoi and the provincial level in Thai Nguyen were conducted.ResultsEight themes emerged from the transcripts of the interviews. From the participants perspectives on the benefits of a One Health approach: (1) Communication and multi-sectorial collaboration; (2) Building comprehensive knowledge; (3) Improving likelihood of success. Five themes emerged from participants views of the challenges to investigate AMR: (4) Diagnostic capacity; (5) Availability and access to antibiotics (6) Tracing ability within the Vietnamese food chain; (7) Personal benefits and (8) Managing the system.ConclusionThe findings of this study suggest that there is potential to strengthen multi-sectorial collaboration between the animal and human health sectors by building upon existing informal networks. Based on these results, we recommend an inclusive approach to multi-sectorial communication supported by government network activities to facilitate partnerships and create cross-disciplinary awareness and participation. The themes relating to diagnostic capacity show that both sectors are facing challenges to undertake investigations in AMR. Our results indicate that the need to strengthen the animal health sector is more pronounced.
- Research Article
15
- 10.1111/zph.13084
- Nov 6, 2023
- Zoonoses and public health
The attainment of the global target of zero dog-mediated human rabies by 2030 depends on functional rabies programmes. Nigeria, a rabies-endemic country, and the most populous country in Africa has a very poor rabies control strategy with a score of 1.5 out of 5 based on the Stepwise Approach towards Rabies Elimination (SARE). In this article, we report a scoping review that we conducted to highlight the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats as well as situational analysis of rabies control in Nigeria and suggest a timeline for key activities that are needed to ensure zero by 30. Our findings reveal that rabies is grossly under-reported as only 998 human and 273 dog-suspected rabies cases were reported across Nigeria between 2017 and 2022. Our literature review also demonstrates a paucity of information on rabies in both human and animal health sectors. A total of 49 studies on dog rabies in Nigeria, with a predominance of reports from the North Central geopolitical region (48%, n = 23) were therefore included in this study. Currently, only 16.2% (n = 6/37) of Nigerian states have available data related to the estimated dog populations, the dog ownership rates, the vaccination status of dogs or the incidence of dog bites. Based on a dog-to-human ratio of 1:16.3, we estimated that the dog population in Nigeria was 12,969,368 (95% CI: 12,320,900-13,617,836). Thus, to attain herd immunity and dog rabies control in Nigeria, at least 9.1 million dogs must be vaccinated annually. Our review reveals that, despite the strengths and available opportunities to achieve rabies control in Nigeria by 2030, the weaknesses and challenges will make the attainment of zero by 30 very difficult or impossible. Nigeria's best-case scenario by the year 2030 is SARE stage 3-4 (control-elimination) out of 5. Otherwise, the rabies control programme might not surpass SARE stages 2-3. To attain zero by 30, Nigeria must re-strategize its current rabies control programme by funding and implementing the national strategic plan for rabies control, creating a rabies desk office in the 37 states (FCT inclusive), rigorously conducting mass vaccination campaigns, providing post-exposure prophylaxis, prioritizing mass enlightenment with a focus on responsible pet ownership and conduct baseline national rabies surveillance in the animal and human health sectors.
- Preprint Article
- 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6496101/v1
- Apr 25, 2025
- Research Square
Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a pressing global public health challenge that requires coordinated multisectoral responses. In line with the Global Action Plan (GAP) on AMR, Jordan developed its first National Action Plan (NAP) for 2018–2022 to guide multisectoral efforts. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of Jordan's AMR NAP, identify progress and challenges across its five strategic objectives, and suggest actionable recommendations for strengthening future AMR responses. Methods The Jordan Center for Disease Control (Jordan CDC) conducted a comprehensive 'end-term evaluation' for the NAP 2018–2022. Data were collected from approximately seventy national stakeholders through a national workshop and follow-up electronic communications. The evaluation tool included sector-specific and multisectoral indicators aligned with the NAP's five objectives. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using SPSS to determine implementation rates across human, animal, and environmental health sectors, applying the One Health approach. Results The evaluation revealed uneven implementation across NAP objectives, with notable achievements in the rational use of antimicrobials (69%) completion, mainly in the human health sector. Infection prevention and control (IPC) efforts reached (63%), while surveillance-related activities achieved (56%). Awareness-related activities reported limited progress (47%), and no activities were implemented under the research and innovation objective. Multisectoral collaboration was limited, particularly in the animal and environmental sectors. Significant barriers included the absence of a unified communication strategy, lack of dedicated funding, insufficient investment in human resources and laboratories, and disruptions caused by the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Conclusions Despite progress in different areas, the overall implementation revealed significant challenges, particularly in research, multisectoral collaboration, and One Health integration. Future action should prioritize a unified national AMR policy framework for strategic planning, emphasizing resource distribution, active participation of all relevant sectors, and systematic monitoring and evaluation to inform policymaking. Strengthening coordination between human, animal, and environmental sectors is essential to achieving a robust, One Health-aligned AMR response in Jordan.
- Research Article
39
- 10.1186/s44149-021-00023-7
- Sep 22, 2021
- Animal Diseases
Rabies is an acute encephalitis caused by a lyssavirus. It is primarily transmitted through bites of infected dogs which results in the worldwide death of an estimated 59000 humans every year. The disease is preventable through the application of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and its elimination has been demonstrated in many countries by applying multiple interventions simultaneously. Nonetheless, rabies is still widespread in many developing countries, primarily due to the poor implementation of intervention strategies that include inadequate dog-bite wound management practices, unavailability/unaffordability of PEP by the communities, failure to control the disease in free-roaming dogs and wildlife, improper dog population management, weak surveillance and diagnostic facilities and a lack of a One Health approach to the disease. In this review, strategies to control dog-mediated rabies through a One Health approach were discussed. We recommend applying multiple interventions against the disease by involving all the concerned stakeholders in selected urban and rural areas of the countries where rabies is endemic. An empirical demonstration of disease freedom in the selected areas through a One Health approach is needed to convince policymakers to invest in rabies prevention and control on the national level. This multifaceted One Health control model will enhance the likelihood of achieving the goal of global rabies eradication by 2030.
- Research Article
- 10.1186/s42522-025-00135-x
- Mar 30, 2025
- One Health Outlook
BackgroundField epidemiologists play a crucial role in addressing the complex challenges posed by emerging infectious diseases, transboundary animal diseases, and antimicrobial resistance. Despite the interdisciplinary nature of these issues, traditional field epidemiology training programs are often narrowly focused on specific sectors. To effectively confront these evolving challenges, it is imperative to equip field epidemiologists with the skills to adopt the One Health approach. However, there are neither globally accepted One Health competencies for guiding field epidemiology training programs nor standardized curricular guidance for program managers. Recognizing this gap, three international organizations joined forces to develop the Competencies for One Health Field Epidemiology framework.MethodsA desktop review was conducted of the existing frontline, intermediate, and advanced field epidemiology training program curricula. Knowledge, skills, and competency (KSC) statements for frontline, intermediate and advanced levels were then defined and grouped into domains and subdomains by thematic area. An international Technical Advisory Group of 59 experts from the animal, environment, and human health sectors was convened to review the proposed statements. The framework was revised based on their feedback. KSC statements were classified into core and optional, and a prioritization tool was developed to assist countries in selecting optional KSC statements based on their specific requirements.ResultsThe competency framework was developed and comprises KSC statements needed for field epidemiologists to successfully apply the One Health approach across the human, animal, and environment health sectors. These KSC statements are stratified by frontline, intermediate, and advanced training levels and are further categorized as core and optional; sector-specific KSC statements are also identified.ConclusionsThis innovative framework emerged from a multisectoral, collaborative, inclusive, and iterative process involving international animal, human, and environment health and field epidemiology training experts. Countries and regions can also use the framework to establish new, comprehensive One Health field epidemiology training programs or upgrade existing programs to incorporate the One Health approach. This framework is anticipated to pave the way for a more holistic approach to training the global community of field epidemiologists in all health sectors to meet the demands of our evolving health landscape.
- Research Article
6
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0254650
- Jul 14, 2021
- PLoS ONE
Dog-mediated rabies is on the increase in Uganda despite the availability of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). PEP procedures are expounded in the Uganda Clinical Guidelines (UCG) of 2016. We assessed adherence by health workers to UCG while managing dog bites in two PEP centers and obtained insights into motivations of their practices. Using qualitative methods, we observed the health worker-patient encounters, reviewed medical records, and interviewed 14 health workers that were involved in managing dog bite injuries. We used deductive thematic analysis to identify codes in themes developed from UCG. We found that much of the history of the bites was taken, but it was neither verified nor written down on the patient’s file. Classification of wounds was inaccurate and ancillary laboratory assessments like culture and sensitivity tests were not conducted in all cases. Although antibiotics were given for both treatment and prophylactic purposes, the prescription was based on availability and affordability, not UCG recommendations. Rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) was not administered to deserving patients due to unavailability and high costs to the patient. Anti-rabies vaccine (ARV) was prescribed indiscriminately and some health workers attributed this to pressure from patients. Health education regarding prevention of dog bites was not given to patients due to time constraints on the side of the providers as a result of high caseloads at the emergency departments. Challenges to adherence to guidelines were identified as frequent ARV stock outs; inadequate cooperation among health facilities; and insufficient knowledge and skills on how injuries and rabies should be managed. We conclude that clinical management of dog bites is not fully in line with UCG. We argue that adoption of an integrated bite case management and cost-saving strategies as well as continuing medical education programs on rabies control and management could improve the clinical management of dog bites.
- Research Article
18
- 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005275
- Jul 1, 2021
- BMJ Global Health
The COVID-19 pandemic is a devastating reminder that mitigating the threat of emerging zoonotic outbreaks relies on our collective capacity to work across human health, animal health and environment sectors....
- Research Article
8
- 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100850
- Jul 3, 2024
- One Health
Dog-mediated rabies is endemic in India. The country records the highest mortality due to dog-bite-related rabies despite the availability of interventions to prevent deaths. We present a case study of the death of a 59-year-old man in a suburban town of Northeast India after a dog bite from an owned pup. Through this case study, we investigate various omissions and commissions in communities and health professionals that make rabies rampant in India. The circumstances surrounding the death were investigated by interviewing the wife, relatives, neighbour, the hospital/nursing home where the bite case was reported, the district Rapid Response Team (RRT), and the Veterinary and Animal Health Department Officer and through the information recorded in the disease outbreak report. While the biting animal was not vaccinated and had no restriction over its movement imposed by the owners, the response of the hospital staff and public authorities was delayed and inadequate. A poignant reminder of the complexities surrounding dog-mediated rabies in India, this case study calls for a holistic protocol to address dog bites through ensuring the One Health approach encompassing education, provision of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and canine rabies vaccines for dogs, promotion of responsible dog ownership, and intersectoral collaboration. Moreover, strengthening communication channels through effective data exchange and encouraging synergy among healthcare, veterinary, and public health sectors is indispensable to maximize the impact of rabies prevention and control interventions.
- Research Article
1
- 10.51891/rease.v11i4.18810
- Apr 23, 2025
- Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bovine mastitis has become an increasing concern for public and veterinary health, compromising the effectiveness of conventional treatments and raising management costs. Mastitis is primarily caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, pathogens that have shown increasing resistance to common antibiotics such as penicillin and tetracycline. The One Health approach, integrating human, animal, and environmental health sectors, emerges as an effective strategy to combat resistance and improve treatment efficacy. This study systematically reviewed articles published between 2020 and 2025, utilizing PubMed, BIREME and SciELO databases, aiming to assess how the One Health approach impacts AMR in mastitis and explore sustainable therapeutic alternatives. A total of 19 articles meeting the inclusion criteria were selected, addressing the prevalence of AMR in mastitis pathogens as well as the application of vaccines and phytotherapies as alternatives to antibiotic use. Results showed that resistance primarily increased due to excessive antibiotic use, while the One Health approach was found promising in controlling resistance by integrating veterinary, public health, and environmental practices. Additionally, sustainable alternatives such as vaccines and phytotherapies proved effective in reducing resistance without introducing new resistance issues. This study concludes that the implementation of the One Health approach, combined with sustainable alternatives, offers an effective model for controlling antimicrobial resistance in bovine mastitis. However, it is important to highlight the scarcity of in-depth studies on the long-term efficacy and viability of sustainable therapeutic alternatives. The lack of robust data limits the application of these solutions in the field and emphasizes the urgent need for new studies to confirm their effectiveness on a large scale. The implementation of public policies encouraging collaboration among human, animal, and environmental health sectors is also essential to optimize outcomes in managing antimicrobial resistance.
- Research Article
2
- 10.1186/s12889-024-18460-7
- Apr 5, 2024
- BMC public health
BackgroundWith increased attention to the importance of integrating the One Health approach into zoonotic disease surveillance and response, a greater understanding of the mechanisms to support effective communication and information sharing across animal and human health sectors is needed. The objectives of this qualitative case study were to describe the communication channels used between human and animal health stakeholders and to identify the elements that have enabled the integration of the One Health approach.MethodsWe combined documentary research with interviews with fifteen stakeholders to map the communication channels used in human and swine influenza surveillance in Alberta, Canada, as well as in the response to a human case of H1N2v in 2020. A thematic analysis of the interviews was also used to identify the barriers and facilitators to communication among stakeholders from the animal and human health sectors.ResultsWhen a human case of swine influenza emerged, the response led by the provincial Chief Medical Officer of Health involved players at various levels of government and in the human and animal health sectors. The collaboration of public and animal health laboratories and of the swine sector, in addition to the information available through the surveillance systems in place, was swift and effective. Elements identified as enabling smooth communication between the human and animal health systems included preexisting relationships between the various stakeholders, a relationship of trust between them (e.g., the swine sector and their perception of government structures), the presence of stakeholders acting as permanent liaisons between the ministries of health and agriculture, and stakeholders' understanding of the importance of the One Health approach.ConclusionsInformation flows through formal and informal channels and both structural and relational features that can support rapid and effective communication in infectious disease surveillance and outbreak response.
- Research Article
20
- 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009274
- Mar 29, 2021
- PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
In 2015, China and other member states of the United Nations adopted the goal of eliminating dog-mediated rabies by 2030. China has made substantial progress in reducing dog-mediated human rabies since peaking with more than 3,300 reported cases in 2007. To further improve coordination and planning, the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, in collaboration with the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, conducted a Stepwise Approach towards Rabies Elimination (SARE) assessment in March 2019. Assessment goals included outlining progress and identifying activities critical for eliminating dog-mediated rabies. Participants representing national, provincial and local human and animal health sectors in China used the SARE assessment tool to answer 115 questions about the current dog-mediated rabies control and prevention programs in China. The established surveillance system for human rabies cases and availability of post-exposure prophylaxis were identified as strengths. Low dog vaccination coverage and limited laboratory confirmation of rabid dogs were identified gaps, resulting in an overall score of 1.5 on a scale of 0 to 5. Participants outlined steps to increase cross-sectoral information sharing, improve surveillance for dog rabies, increase dog vaccination coverage, and increase laboratory capacity to diagnose rabies at the provincial level. All assessment participants committed to strengthening cross-sector collaboration using a One Health approach to achieve dog-mediated human rabies elimination by 2030.
- Research Article
100
- 10.3389/fvets.2017.00038
- Apr 3, 2017
- Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Rabies claims approximately 59,000 human lives annually and is a potential risk to 3.3 billion people in over 100 countries worldwide. Despite being fatal in almost 100% of cases, human rabies can be prevented by vaccinating dogs, the most common vector, and the timely administration of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to exposed victims. For the control and prevention of human rabies in N’Djamena, the capital city of Chad, a free mass vaccination campaign for dogs was organized in 2012 and 2013. The campaigns were monitored by parallel studies on the incidence of canine rabies based on diagnostic testing of suspect animals and the incidence of human bite exposure recorded at selected health facilities. Based on the cost description of the campaign and the need for PEP registered in health centers, three cost scenarios were compared: cumulative cost-efficiency of (1) PEP alone, (2) dog mass vaccination and PEP, (3) dog mass vaccination, PEP, and maximal communication between human health and veterinary workers (One Health communication). Assuming ideal One Health communication, the cumulative prospective cost of dog vaccination and PEP break even with the cumulative prospective cost of PEP alone in the 10th year from the start of the calculation (2012). The cost efficiency expressed in cost per human exposure averted is much higher with canine vaccination and One Health communication than with PEP alone. As shown in other studies, our cost-effectiveness analysis highlights that canine vaccination is financially the best option for animal rabies control and rabies prevention in humans. This study also provides evidence of the beneficial effect of One Health communication. Only with close communication between the human and animal health sectors will the decrease in animal rabies incidence be translated into a decline for PEP. An efficiently applied One Health concept would largely reduce the cost of PEP in resource poor countries and should be implemented for zoonosis control in general.
- Research Article
145
- 10.1016/j.soh.2023.100050
- Jan 1, 2023
- Science in One Health
Surveillance and response strategies for zoonotic diseases: a comprehensive review
- Research Article
8
- 10.1186/s12992-024-01055-7
- Jun 20, 2024
- Globalization and Health
IntroductionThe wildlife trade is an important arena for intervention in the prevention of emerging zoonoses, and leading organisations have advocated for more collaborative, multi-sectoral approaches to governance in this area. The aim of this study is to characterise the structure and function of the network of transnational organisations that interact around the governance of wildlife trade for the prevention of emerging zoonoses, and to assess these network characteristics in terms of how they might support or undermine progress on these issues.MethodsThis study used a mixed methods social network analysis of transnational organisations. Data were collected between May 2021 and September 2022. Participants were representatives of transnational organisations involved in the governance of wildlife trade and the prevention of emerging zoonoses. An initial seed sample of participants was purposively recruited through professional networks, and snowball sampling was used to identify additional participants. Quantitative data were collected through an online network survey. Measures of centrality (degree, closeness, and betweenness) were calculated and the network’s largest clique was identified and characterised. To understand the extent to which organisations were connected across sectors, homophily by sector was assessed using exponential random graph modelling. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The findings from the quantitative analysis informed the focus of the qualitative analysis. Qualitative data were explored using thematic analysis.ResultsThirty-seven participants completed the network survey and 17 key informants participated in semi-structured interviews. A total of 69 organisations were identified as belonging to this network. Organisations spanned the animal, human, and environmental health sectors, among others including trade, food and agriculture, and crime. Organisation types included inter-governmental organisations, non-governmental organisations, treaty secretariats, research institutions, and network organisations. Participants emphasised the highly inter-sectoral nature of this topic and the importance of inter-sectoral work, and connections were present across existing sectors. However, there were many barriers to effective interaction, particularly conflicting goals and agendas. Power dynamics also shaped relationships between actors, with the human health sector seen as better resourced and more influential, despite having historically lower engagement than the environmental and animal health sectors around the wildlife trade and its role in emerging zoonoses.ConclusionThe network of transnational organisations focused on the governance of wildlife trade and the prevention of emerging zoonoses is highly multi-sectoral, but despite progress catalysed by the COVID-19 pandemic, barriers still exist for inter-sectoral interaction and coordination. A One Health approach to governance at this level, which has gained traction throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, was shared as a promising mechanism to support a balancing of roles and agendas in this space. However, this must involve agreement around equity, priorities, and clear goal setting to support effective action.