Abstract
Abstract Ten years ago, in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, the Supreme Court announced a new “categorical” test for regulatory takings, a step that logically implied that there must also be a “noncategorical” takings test (based, most presumed, on the Court's 1978 decision in Penn Central). Thus ensued a frantic effort among academics and takings practitioners to make sense of (or debunk) this two-tier analysis, an effort to which I contributed in the pages of this journal with an article entitled “Is the Penn Central Three Factor Test Ready for History's Dustbin?” (Vol. 52, No. 1).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
