Abstract

Many biological systems are modulated by unknown slow processes. This can severely hinder analysis – especially in excitable neurons, which are highly non-linear and stochastic systems. We show the analysis simplifies considerably if the input matches the sparse “spiky” nature of the output. In this case, a linearized spiking Input–Output (I/O) relation can be derived semi-analytically, relating input spike trains to output spikes based on known biophysical properties. Using this I/O relation we obtain closed-form expressions for all second order statistics (input – internal state – output correlations and spectra), construct optimal linear estimators for the neuronal response and internal state and perform parameter identification. These results are guaranteed to hold, for a general stochastic biophysical neuron model, with only a few assumptions (mainly, timescale separation). We numerically test the resulting expressions for various models, and show that they hold well, even in cases where our assumptions fail to hold. In a companion paper we demonstrate how this approach enables us to fit a biophysical neuron model so it reproduces experimentally observed temporal firing statistics on days-long experiments.

Highlights

  • Neurons are modeled biophysically using Conductance-Based Models (CBMs)

  • FULL MODEL The voltage dynamics of an isopotential neuron are determined by ion channels, protein pores which change their conformations stochastically with voltage-dependent rates (Hille, 2001)

  • This linearization considerably reduces model complexity and parameter degeneracy, and enables the use of standard analysis and estimation tools. This method is rather general, since it can be applied to any stochastic CBM, with only a few assumptions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In CBMs, the membrane time constant and the timescales of fast channel kinetics determine the timescale of Action Potential (AP) generation in the neuron. Additional new sub-cellular kinetic processes are being discovered at an explosive rate (Bean, 2007; Sjöström et al, 2008; Debanne et al, 2011). This variety is large for very slow processes (Marom, 2010)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.