Abstract

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) have been employed to investigate the nature of chromium-promoted tin(IV) oxide catalyst materials prepared via three routes, by the impregnation of SnO2 using aqueous CrO3 or chromium(III) nitrate solutions and by coprecipitation from aqueous solutions containing both Sn(IV) and Cr(III) ions. The catalyst materials exhibit three different chromium signals (δ, γ, and β) in the EPR, depending on the treatment history of the catalysts. The δ-signal results from dispersed Cr3+ ions and appears in the spectra of the Cr(III)-promoted SnO2 catalyst at all temperatures and also in the spectra for the Cr(VI)-promoted catalyst after calcination. The β-signal detected for the uncalcined Cr(III)-promoted catalyst obtained by coprecipitation is most probably due to the hydrated γ-CrOOH phase but to Cr2O3 at higher calcination temperatures. Both Cr(III)- and Cr(VI)-promoted catalyst materials exhibit the γ-signal after calcination at temp...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.