Abstract
We characterize the equilibrium set of the n-player Hirshleifer contest with homogeneous valuations. A symmetric equilibrium always exists. It necessarily corresponds to multilateral peace for sufficient noise and uses finite-support randomized strategies otherwise. Asymmetric equilibria are feasible for n≥3 contestants only, and only for sufficiently small noise. In pure strategies, any asymmetric equilibrium corresponds to one-sided dominance, but there is also a variety of payoff-inequivalent mixed-strategy equilibria for small noise. For arbitrarily small noise, at least two contestants engage in cut-throat competition, while any others become ultimately inactive. Of some conceptual interest is the observation that, for n sufficiently large, the unique equilibrium is multilateral peace.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
