The muddy waters of idiom comprehension

Abstract

Target sentences containing familiar and less familiar idioms used either literally or figuratively or containing no idioms were presented repeatedly for 100 msec per presentation. Each sentence was preceded by a short paragraph. The number of presentations required to read each target sentence and the cued recall of those target sentences containing idioms were recorded. Control sentences required fewer presentations to be read than all sentences except those with less familiar idioms used literally. Sentences with less familiar idioms used literally required fewer presentations to be read than those with less familiar idioms used figuratively and those with familiar idioms used literally. Familiar idioms were recalled significantly more often than less familiar idioms. The results of this study were unexpected and a model of idiom comprehension incorporating these results and those of other researchers is proposed. This model suggests that idioms fall along continuums of figurative meaning familiarity and literal meaning likelihood, and that their positions along these continuums determines whether the figurative or the literal meaning is processed initially.