Abstract

The close-knit group of apicomplexan parasites displays a wide variety of cell division modes, which differ between parasites as well as between different life stages within a single parasite species. The beginning and endpoint of the asexual replication cycles is a ‘zoite’ harboring the defining apical organelles required for host cell invasion. However, the number of zoites produced per division round varies dramatically and can unfold in several different ways. This plasticity of the cell division cycle originates from a combination of hard-wired developmental programs modulated by environmental triggers. Although the environmental triggers and sensors differ between species and developmental stages, widely conserved secondary messengers mediate the signal transduction pathways. These environmental and genetic input integrate in division-mode specific chromosome organization and chromatin modifications that set the stage for each division mode. Cell cycle progression is conveyed by a smorgasbord of positively and negatively acting transcription factors, often acting in concert with epigenetic reader complexes, that can vary dramatically between species as well as division modes. A unique set of cell cycle regulators with spatially distinct localization patterns insert discrete check points which permit individual control and can uncouple general cell cycle progression from nuclear amplification. Clusters of expressed genes are grouped into four functional modules seen in all division modes: 1. mother cytoskeleton disassembly; 2. DNA replication and segregation (D&S); 3. karyokinesis; 4. zoite assembly. A plug-and-play strategy results in the variety of extant division modes. The timing of mother cytoskeleton disassembly is hard-wired at the species level for asexual division modes: it is either the first step, or it is the last step. In the former scenario zoite assembly occurs at the plasma membrane (external budding), and in the latter scenario zoites are assembled in the cytoplasm (internal budding). The number of times each other module is repeated can vary regardless of this first decision, and defines the modes of cell division: schizogony, binary fission, endodyogeny, endopolygeny.

Highlights

  • The phylum Apicomplexa harbors a staggering diversity of asexual cell division modes (Gubbels et al, 2020)

  • We are considering five archetypical division modes in this review in a number of representative species (Figure 1): schizogony in Plasmodium spp.; binary fission in the large Babesia spp.; endodyogeny in Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites; endopolygeny with karyokinesis in Cystoisospora suis and T. gondii merozoites; endopolygeny without karyokinesis in Sarcocystis neurona (Gubbels et al, 2020). These all represent parasites with an impact on humans either as direct pathogens (Plasmodium, Babesia, Toxoplasma) or pathogens of animals relevant to humans (Cystoisospora, Sarcocystis, Babesia). This selection does by no means exhaust the diversity observed across the Apicomplexa but it represents the species whose division modes have been studied to a reasonable extent at the ultrastructural, cell biological, and molecular level

  • The invasion competence and the asexual division mode driven by cortical cytoskeleton budding are closely interwoven features of these parasites

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The phylum Apicomplexa harbors a staggering diversity of asexual cell division modes (Gubbels et al, 2020). The T. gondii centrosome is anchored to the nucleus by the spindle microtubules on one side (Farrell and Gubbels, 2014) and in the apical end of the daughter bud by a striated rootlet fiber protein assembly (SFA) (Francia et al, 2012).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.