Abstract

In an article on the Persian manuscript of Tatian's Diatessaron in Florence (The Art Bulletin, l, 1968, 119–140), Carl Nordenfalk draws two conclusions which, if true, would radically affect certain of our ideas about the beginnings of both Early Christian and medieval art. He believes that the four decorated pages at the end of this codex, made for an Armenian bishop in 1547, preserve the types and even detailed forms of the ornament and pictures in a Greek manuscript produced in Rome about a.d. 170 under Tatian's eyes (Figs. 1–4). They are then an evidence of the character of Christian art fifty years before the oldest surviving examples of Christian painting and sculpture. In the second place, the decoration and images of the Tatian manuscript in Florence appear to Nordenfalk so similar to the ornament and figures in the earliest Hiberno-Saxon manuscripts – the Books of Durrow, Echternach, Kells and others – that the genesis and certain peculiarities of that insular art – so isolated among the works of their time – can be explained by the copying of a Diatessaron manuscript like the archetype of the Florence codex. “Insular illumination,” he writes, “rested mainly on one pillar: a copy of an illustrated edition of Tatian's Diatessaron” (page 140).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.