Abstract

We provide an outline for viewing the middle-income trap through the lens of the Schumpeterian growth paradigm, which places the notion of creative destruction at the center of economic growth. Economic growth and development come from the interplay between changes in economic structure and supporting institutions at different stages of development, i.e., structural transformation. We present a view of the process of economic development that takes the microlevel growth of firms and their competitive interaction as its building blocks. We discuss how institutional factors affect the evolution of these building blocks in understanding growth outcomes at different stages of development.

Highlights

  • This paper provides an outline for viewing the middle-income trap through the lens of the Schumpeterian growth paradigm, which places the notion of creative destruction at the center of economic growth

  • We argue that economic growth and development come from the complex interplay between changes in economic structure and supporting institutions at different stages of development, i.e., structural transformation

  • We present a view of the process of economic development that takes the microlevel growth of firms and their competitive interaction as its building blocks

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

This paper provides an outline for viewing the middle-income trap through the lens of the Schumpeterian growth paradigm, which places the notion of creative destruction at the center of economic growth. Firm size and firm age are more highly correlated in developed economies than in emerging economies This is related to the fact that small firms exit more frequently, but the ones that survive tend to grow faster than the average growth rate in the developed world (Aghion, Akcigit, and Howitt 2013). Hsieh and Klenow (2009) suggest that both India and the PRC could have increased their manufacturing output substantially if the relatively large firms in each country were able to expand at the cost of smaller firms in their industries Understanding why such reallocation does not happen in emerging economies is one of the key factors that explains how countries get stuck in the convergence trap

IMPLICATIONS FOR EMERGING ASIA
VIII. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK
Findings
16 | References

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.