Abstract
The comes Africae Heraclianus’ revolt (413 C.E.) has usually been interpreted as an attempt to usurp imperial power. This article will argue that Heraclianus was not a usurper, but that he had simply wished to secure his influence over the emperor Honorius when he felt threatened by the generalissimo Constantius.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.