Abstract

Patients with diabetes mellitus have worse long-term outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than non-diabetics. This may be related to differential contribution of neutrophil and lymphocyte to inflammation during AMI in diabetics vs. non-diabetics. We aim to determine the predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for major adverse events post-AMI in Type 2 diabetics vs. non-diabetics. A total of 2559 consecutive patients admitted for AMI (61 ± 14 years, 73% male and 43% diabetic) were analyzed. A complete blood count was obtained and the NLR computed for each patient on admission. Across the cohort, the 1-year reinfarction rate was 8.4% (n = 214) and 1-year mortality was 14.5% (n = 370). Univariate determinants of the composite endpoint included age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, revascularization and NLR (P < 0.001 for all). The cohort was divided into NLR quartiles. Admission NLR was significantly higher in the diabetic group, 5.2 ± 5.8 vs. 4.6 ± 5.4 (P = 0.007). A step-wise increase in the incidence of the composite endpoint was noted across NLR quartiles for diabetic subjects; hazard ratio (HR) was 2.41 for fourth vs. first quartile (95% confidence interval = 1.63-3.53, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of the diabetic group showed that NLR remains as an independent predictor of the composite endpoint (adjusted HR = 1.53, 95% confidence interval = 1.00-2.33, P = 0.048). However, in non-diabetics, HR for NLR was not significant (P = 0.35). Increased NLR post-AMI is an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events in diabetics. Monitoring this easily obtainable new index allows prognostication and risk stratification.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.