Abstract
Ovid's imitation of Horace's Exegi monumentum is the culminating image of the ekphrastic and iconic modes of the many lifelike statues in Metamorphoses . In the fourth century, classical concepts of metamorphosis and metaphor play an integral role in the formulation of Eastern Orthodox concepts of Incarnation and theosis . This article demonstrates the intersection of the Ovidian and Orthodox paradigms of the lifelike statue in Pushkin's imitation of Horace and its various Russian manifestations: Monument (1836). Analysis refines notions of the conflict between word and image in the poem to emphasize the mutually enlightening progressions of matter and spirit as a continuum, not a binary opposition, challenging traditional interpretations of Monument. Pushkin's concept of his poetic legacy rejects the notion of a static immortality, privileging writerly over readerly reception as the fundamental component of his life after death. The sulunar pit that Pushkin references in the second stanza is read not as a future sympathetic reader, but as a future innovative writer that will transform Pushkin's works into new ones, thereby ensuring the poet's vital and earthly immortality. Pushkin's sculptural myth becomes a paradigm for allusion as the rite by which the sacred life of poetry is perennially renewed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.