Abstract

The number of monikers early cell biologists attached to the nuclear lamina reflected their uncertainty about its function and architecture, and whether it was widespread or confined to a few specialized cells. Electron micrographs often disclosed a layer of varying thickness nestled against the backside of the nuclear membrane, which various researchers dubbed the “dense lamella,” “fibrous lamina,” “zona nucleum limitans,” or just plain “lamina.” Gunter Blobel (Rockefeller University, New York, NY) had his mind on the signal hypothesis, for which he won the Nobel Prize in 1999 (see “Lost in translation: the signal hypothesis” JCB 170:338), but he decided to take a crack at deciphering the lamina. Aaronson and Blobel (1974) used detergent to peel away the membranes from isolated nuclei. The husks that remained held their shape. This sturdy layer, they proposed, was the lamina, and the results suggested two of its functions—bracing the nucleus and cradling the nuclear pores. Two follow-up studies (Aaronson and Blobel, 1975; Dwyer and Blobel, 1976) provided more evidence that the layer they had identified enclosed the nucleus and wasn't just part of the membrane. Then Larry Gerace (Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA), Blobel's first Ph.D. student, picked up the analysis. He wanted to definitively describe the lamina in part because of what he viewed as the erroneous conclusions of Berezney and Coffey (1977). They had proposed that proteins not only formed the lamina but also a “nuclear matrix” that extended throughout the nucleus and intermingled with the DNA. “Our localization was a riposte to their conclusions,” Gerace says. He characterized three lamina proteins and created antibodies against them. Immunoperoxidase staining showed that the antibodies strongly labeled the rim of the nucleus; they didn't recognize anything in the interior (Gerace et al., 1978). Rather than a mesh that permeated the nucleus, the lamina was a protein polymer that hugged the nuclear membrane, the researchers concluded—and subsequent work has backed them up. The proteins Gerace identified turned out to be lamins A, B1, and C, three of the four major components that interweave to form the lamina. “We felt we had made a conclusive argument that lamins are primarily at the nuclear envelope, and the data have held up,” says Gerace. Blobel describes this series of studies as one of the first examples of molecular cell biology. Instead of being content to identify new cellular structures, researchers were now breaking down these discoveries into their molecular components to elucidate their workings. ML Figure An immunoperoxidase stain that tags one lamina protein doesn't penetrate the nucleus (“La” indicates the lamina; arrows mark nuclear pores). Aaronson, R.P., and G. Blobel. 1974. J. Cell Biol. 62:746–754. [PubMed] Aaronson, R.P., and G. Blobel. 1975. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 72:1007–1011. [PubMed] Berezney, R., and D.S. Coffey. 1977. J. Cell Biol. 73:616–637. [PubMed] Dwyer, N., and G. Blobel. 1976. J. Cell Biol. 70:581–591. [PubMed] Gerace, L., et al. 1978. J. Cell Biol. 79:546–566. [PubMed]

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.