Abstract

Prior research has shown journalists often rely on gender and racial stereotypes when covering female and minority candidates running against a White, male for political office. This study uses a content analysis of newspaper articles and editorials to examine what changes, if any, occur in media coverage when a woman and a minority run against each other without a White, male candidate in the race. The findings of this research indicate that journalists in this study have made some progress in reducing stereotypes in their coverage; however, they are still covering candidates in significant stereotypical ways. Although these journalists are focusing less on appearance of candidates, the female candidate in this study received more coverage about her gender, and the minority candidate received more coverage of his race. Despite the candidates' previous experience to the contrary, these journalists still aligned the woman candidate with traditional female issues and the man with traditional male issues.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.