Abstract
Abstract This study examines the impact of risk framing (national security versus climate change) on attitude toward policy, negative affect and individual support for hard policy. A between-subject, vignettebased experiment was conducted. Results show that both climate change and energy security policies receive above-average support and evoke moderate levels of negative affect. In addition, no statistically significant results were found between the two risk framing policies. Moreover, attitude towards policy predicts individual support for hard policy, whereas negative affect has no influence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
