Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of “comparative law” as a meta-theory of legal comparative formed within the framework of General theoretical legal science. The doctrine of legal comparison finds its expression in comparative law, while comparative jurisprudence is the empirical basis for the formation of comparative legal science (legal comparative). The author distinguishes between descriptive comparative jurisprudence and the doctrine of comparative legal science presented in the form of comparative law. Through the prism of the distinction between scientific and educational components of comparative legal science, the issues of the characteristics of modern law as a product of the integration of legal systems and their national components are highlighted. The features of law (normativity, formal certainty, state guarantee, etc.) studied in the course of General theory of law are analyzed using a comparative approach and from the standpoint of an independent component of legal comparative studies - comparative law.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
