The Influence of Good Corporate Governance, Intellectual Capital on Intellectual Capital Disclosure with Financial Performance as an Intervening Variable

This study aims to determine the effect of good corporate governance (managerial ownership, institutional ownership, number of board of commissioners, and audit committees) on the company's financial performance in construction and building sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. In addition, this research also aims to determine whether earnings management can be used as a moderation variable for managerial ownership relationships, institutional ownership, the number of board of commissioners, and audit committees with the company's financial performance. The research design conducted is a causal relationship research with a quantitative approach. The sample in this study was ten construction and building sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2013 to 2021. The type of data used in this study was secondary data. Sample determination techniques using purposive sampling. Data analysis techniques use multiple linear regression analysis and residual tests for moderation variables conducted with the help of EViews software 10. The results in this study indicate that partially managerial ownership has a positive and significant effect on the company's financial performance, institutional ownership has a negative and significant impact on the company's financial performance, the number of the board of commissioners has a positive but not significant effect on the company's financial performance, and the audit committee has a negative but not significant impact on the company's financial performance as well as other results show that earning management needs to moderate the influence of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, or the number of boards of commissioners and audit committees on the company's financial performance in the construction and building sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Keywords: Good Corporate Governance, Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, Number of Commissioners, Audit Committees, Company Financial Performance, and Earning Management.

Bank companies are one of the sectors that encourage the pace of Indonesian economic growth. In order to run its business, banks are required to implement good corporate governance to minimize aberrations that might impact the company's financial performance. The Board of directors, ownership structure, and firm size are some of the most important parts of maintaining the bank business through the good corporate governance mechanism. This research was conducted to analyze and to study the influence of the size of the board of directors, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, and firm size on the company's financial performance that is projected on return on assets, where an empirical study was carried out on banking companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange for the 2019-2022 period. The sample for this research came from 22 companies that met the purposive sampling criteria, where the companies were multiplied by 4 periods to obtain 88 samples. The results of this research show that partially, there is an influence of institutional ownership on financial performance. In contrast, the size of the board of directors, managerial ownership, and firm size have no partial effect on financial performance. Then for simultaneous testing, there is the influence of good corporate governance (board of director size, institutional ownership, managerial ownership), and firm size on financial performance. Keywords: Good Corporate Governance, Board of Director Size, Institutional Ownership, Managerial Ownership, Firm Size, Return On Assets

This study aims to examine the influence of good corporate governance and intellectual capital to financial performance (financial performance). Corporate governance mechanisms in this research are managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and the proportion of independentcommissioners. Intellectual capital is measured using Value Added Intellectual Capital (VAIC) model which has three components (physical capital, human capital and structural capital), and financial performance is measured by return on assets (ROA). Secondary data was used by derived from the financial statements of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2014-2016. The sampling technique used purposive sampling method with multiple linear regression analysis tools. Prior the regression test, the classical assumption test is done first. The results show that managerial ownership, institutional ownership and independent commissioner's proportion have no effect on financial performance, while intellectual capital has an effect on financial performance. The conclusion of this research is that intellectual capital can be used to improve financial performance if company can measure accurately but corporate governance still not proven can improve company's financial performance.

The purpose of this research is to examine the impact of good corporate governance and intellectual capital on the financial performance of entertainment and media companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2014 to 2021. Good corporate governance is measured using the good corporate governance index, while intellectual capital is measured using the VAICTM. This study adopts a quantitative research approach and utilizes secondary data. The sampling technique employed is non-probability sampling with a purposive sampling method. The samples obtained from the selection results were 4 companies. Logistic regression is used as the data analysis technique in this research, utilizing SPSS 26 software. The findings of this study indicate that good corporate governance does not have a significant impact on financial performance, whereas intellectual capital has a positive and significant impact on financial performance.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the comparison of the influence of Good Corporate Governance, Return on Asset, Net Profit Margin on corporate value with Corporate Social Responsibility as a moderation variable of empirical studies on banking and mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The study used 26 banking companies and 15 mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange selected using the Purposive Sampling method in the period 2016-2020. This research data was analyzed using multiple regression analysis methods. The results showed that simultaneously the influence of variables Good Corporate Governance, Return On Asset, Net Profit Margin, and Corporate Social Responsibility positively affect the value of banking and mining companies. Return on Asset partially has no significant effect on the value of banking companies, while Return On Asset partially has a significant positive effect on the value of mining companies. Net Profit Margin partially had no significant effect on the value of banking and mining companies. The study also found that partial interaction of Corporate Social Responsibility variables proved to significantly moderate the relationship of the influence of Good Corporate Governance, Return On Asset, Net Profit Margin on the value of banking and mining companies.

This research aims to examine the influence of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) including institutional ownership and the board of commissioners on financial performance with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as an intervening variable. This research uses financial performance as the dependent variable and Good Corporate Governance as a proxy for institutional ownership and the board of commissioners as the independent variable and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as the intervening variable. This type of research is associative research. This research uses secondary data in the form of annual financial reports originating from the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI). The population in this research is Primary Consumer Sub-Sector Companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2018-2022. The sampling technique in this research used a purposive sampling method, 7 companies were obtained as research samples. The data analysis technique in this study uses the multiple linear regression analysis method and the data analysis tool in this study uses the Eviews version 12 software program. The results of the study show that GCG and CSR together have a positive effect on the company's financial performance, while the proxies for institutional ownership and the board commissioner is partially insignificant. Likewise, CSR does not have a significant impact on financial performance. In addition, the board of commissioners proxy influences financial performance through CSR as a moderation, while the institutional ownership proxy does not have a similar effect.Keywords: Good Corporate Governance, Institutional Ownership, Board of Commissioners, Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Performance

This study aims to analyze the partial and simultaneous influence of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Risk Management, and Company Size on Financial Performance (Return on Assets/ROA) in 47 banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2022-2024 period. The main issue is the inconsistency of banks' financial performance amidst the challenges of digitalization and rampant governance cases, which reinforces the urgency of implementing effective GCG and risk management. The method used is Panel Data Regression analysis with a Random Effects model, which meets the classical assumptions (Normality, Multicollinearity, Autocorrelation, and Heteroscedasticity). The F-test results indicate that GCG, Risk Management, and Company Size simultaneously have a significant effect on Financial Performance with an R2 value of 33.26%. Partially, the variables Independent Commissioners, Audit Committee, Non-Performing Loans (NPL), BOPO, and Company Size were found to have a significant effect on ROA. Meanwhile, Institutional Ownership, Managerial Ownership, and Net Interest Margin (NIM) did not have a significant impact. The conclusion confirms that strengthening GCG mechanisms (Independent Commissioners and Audit Committees), credit risk control (NPL), operational efficiency (BOPO), and utilizing economies of scale (Company Size) are key factors in increasing bank profitability in Indonesia.

State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) which were previously managed entirely by the Government, have shifted the paradigm to professional management. This research is a quantitative study that examines the influence of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Intellectual Capital, and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on Financial Performance and Company Value. The study population is a state-owned company listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange that is not financial, so that 16 companies are obtained. The results showed that: (1) GCG has a positive effect on firm value; (2) Intellectual Capital has a positive effect on company value; (3) CSR has a negative effect on company value; (4) financial performance has a positive effect on firm value; (5) GCG has a positive effect on financial performance; (6) Intellectual Capital has a positive effect on financial performance; (7) CSR has a positive effect on financial performance; (8) Financial performance mediates the effect of GCG on firm value; (9) Financial performance mediates the effect of Intellectual Capital on firm value; and (10) Financial performance mediates the effect of CSR on firm value. This novel research lies in the GCG measurement indicators that use 5 pillars, namely: Transparency, Accountability, Responsibility, Independence, and Fairness (TARIF). The theoretical implications of this research relate to signaling theory that companies that implement GCG, pay attention to intellectual capital, and CSR are captured as a positive signal to investors. In addition, theoretical implications also relate to stakeholder theory that companies that apply GCG, pay attention to intellectual capital, and CSR make managers more focused on managing the company, without being hindered by social cases, human rights, demonstrations from the public, thus making stakeholders protected.

Financial distress is a situation that arises when a company has an unstable financial situation. If this condition continues, it will impact the company’s bankruptcy. This research aims to determine the influence of Good Corporate Governance, Firm Size, and Operating Capacity on Financial Distress in the retail trade sub-sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2022. The independent variables of Good Corporate Governance include the audit committee, board of commissioners, board of directors, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership. The research method uses a quantitative and associative approach. The population in this study was 27 companies with a sampling technique using purposive sampling, and 25 companies were obtained as samples, so 150 observation data were obtained. The data analysis technique in this research uses logistic regression analysis using IBM SPSS 25 software. The partial research results show that the audit committee, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and firm size do not affect financial distress. The board of commissioners, board of directors, and operating capacity negatively affect financial distress. Simultaneously, Good Corporate Governance, Firm Size, and Operating Capacity influence financial distress. This research implies that companies must pay attention to the good corporate governance sub-variables related to the board of commissioners and board of directors because these sub-variables have been proven to influence financial distress. Apart from that, companies must also pay attention to their operating capacity because, in this research, this variable was proven to influence financial distress.

The aim of this research is to determine the influence of good corporate governance and asset management on financial performance with ERP (enterprise resource planning) as mediation variable in construction subsector in Indonesia in 2023. The object of this research is all company in construction subsector in Indonesia. The objectives are, (1) To determine the influence of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), (2) To determine the influence of Asset Management on Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), (3) To determine the effect of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) on Financial Performance. (4) To determine the influence of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on financial performance both directly and indirectly through ERP as a mediating variable, and (5) To determine the influence of Asset Management on financial performance both directly and indirectly through ERP as a mediating variable. The methodology used in this research is descriptive statistical analysis, path analysis, and chi square analysis. And result of this research is Good Corporate Governance (GCG) has a significant influence on Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with a direct influence of 73.2%. ERP itself has a significant influence on Financial Performance, with a value of 1.570 and a significance of 0.043, and a direct influence of 246%. Meanwhile, GCG does not have a direct influence on Financial Performance, but through ERP as a mediating variable with an indirect influence of 134%. This shows that ERP fully mediates the relationship between GCG and Financial Performance.

This study investigates the direct and indirect effects, mediated by audit committee quality, of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and profitability on intellectual capital (IC) disclosure. The object observed of this study is companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in the 2014-2018 period that are classified as high intellectual capital-intensive industries. Based on the sampling method, purposive sampling, 51 companies were selected as samples. This study used path analysis techniques with IBM SPSS version 25 to study the direct and indirect influences of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and profitability toward IC disclosure. The results of this study show that managerial ownership, profitability and audit committee quality have a significant positive effect on IC disclosure whereas institutional ownership has significant negative effect on IC disclosure. This study also provides empirical evidence, supported by the sobel test, that the audit committee quality is able to mediate the effect of institutional ownership and profitability on IC disclosure. However, the audit committee quality is not able to mediate the effect of managerial ownership on IC disclosure. These findings develop and strengthen the results of prior studies related to the implementation of signaling theory and agency theory in devoting more understanding about IC disclosure.

The Effect of Ownership Structure and Iso 14001 Certification on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure with Company Size as A Moderating Variable

This study aims to analyze the influence of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), intellectual capital, and leverage on firm value in technology sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2021–2024 period. GCG is measured through three indicators: managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and the presence of an audit committee. Intellectual capital is measured using the Value Added Intellectual Coefficient (VAIC™) method, while leverage is measured using the Debt to Equity Ratio (DER). Firm value as the dependent variable is measured using the Tobin's Q ratio. This study uses a quantitative approach with secondary data obtained from annual reports and financial statements of companies accessed through the official IDX website and each company's website. A purposive sampling technique was used to determine the sample, and eight companies were obtained with a total of 32 observation data over a four-year period. The results show that leverage has a significant effect on firm value, indicating that appropriate and proportional debt structure management is a key factor in increasing the value of companies in the technology sector. Meanwhile, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, the presence of an audit committee, and intellectual capital did not show a significant effect on firm value. This suggests that, in the technology sector, external financing strategies play a greater role than internal company factors such as ownership structure and intangible assets. These findings are expected to serve as a reference for company management and investors in formulating financing policies and managing knowledge-based resources.

This study examines the effect of environmental performance on company value by mediating financial performance and good corporate governance. The research objective is to find empirical evidence about (1) the influence of environmental performance on company value, (2) the influence of environmental performance on financial performance, (3) the influence of environmental performance on good corporate governance. (4) the influence of financial performance on company value. (5) the influence of Good Corporate Governance on company value, (6) the influence of environmental performance on company value by mediating financial performance, (7) the influence of environmental performance on company value by mediating Good Corporate Governance. Environmental performance is measured using PROPER and company value is measured using Price Book Value, for the mediating variable Environmental Financial Performance is measured using ROA, Good Corporate Governance is measured using institutional ownership. The object of this research is a group of manufacturing industries listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in the 2015-2019 period. The research sample was 55 companies with 5 years of observation. The data analysis test tool used warp PLS 5.0 software for each variable. The test results show that environmental performance has no significant effect on company value, environmental performance has a significant and positive effect on financial performance, environmental performance has a significant and positive effect on institutional ownership, financial performance has a significant and positive effect on company value, institutional ownership has no effect on company value. , Environmental Performance has an effect on company value through Financial Performance, Environmental Performance has no effect on company value through Institutional Ownership.

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate how much influence good corporate governance (GCG) has on corporate value, as well as moderating effect of stock return and financial performance on the influence of GCG on corporate value. Design/methodology/approach This study was an explanatory study. The unit of analysis was the companies listed in LQ45 in Indonesian Stock Exchange and the sources of data were ICMD, annual report and financial reports of the companies. Indonesian Stock Exchange was selected as the setting of the study since Indonesian Stock Exchange is one of trading places for various types of companies in Indonesia, and it provides complete information on company’s financial data and stock price. The population was 84 companies listed in LQ45 in Indonesian Stock Exchange between 2010 and 2016. Findings The higher GCG, independent commissioners proportion, institutional managerial and public ownerships resulted in higher corporate value. MBE and PER stock return is a moderating variable in the influence of GCG on corporate value. Financial performance is moderating variable in the influence of GCG on corporate value. Originality/value Based on the previous studies, it may be concluded that there is a gap between the influence of GCG on corporate value and the influence of stock return on financial performance, and moderating variable is needed to evaluate the influence of GCG on company performance, more particularly stock return and financial performance. This discrepancy creates opportunity for conducting an in-depth study on those variables. Its novelty is correlation between stock return and financial performance as moderation. Previous studies used these as mediating variables. This study is going to generate different finding as it is conducted in different setting (country where this study is conducted), type of industry, research period and using different method of analysis.