Abstract

Pedestrians have to take actions when crossing other pedestrians to avoid collisions. In this work, we focus on the differences of avoidance behaviors when a pedestrian crosses a moving and fixed intruder (NPC) in the virtual environment. The avoidance process is divided into three stages using the start avoidance point and maximum lateral deviation point. In moving NPC experiments, the distance from start avoidance point to the potential collision point (CP) first decreases and then increases as the intrusion angle increases. In standing NPC experiments, pedestrians start avoidance closer to the CP (average distance: 3.73m). In moving NPC experiments, the average maximum lateral offset distance (MLD) for the pedestrians to detour decreases with the intrusion angles decreases (Behind MLD ∈[1.09 m, 1.94 m], Front MLD ∈[1.13 m, 1.56 m]). In standing NPC experiments, the average MLD is 1.01m (left: 1.04m, right: 0.98m), which is the closest to the MLD of pedestrians at 180° intrusion angles. What’s more, at 30°, 60°, 90° and 120° intrusion angles, pedestrians avoiding behind the NPC require higher MLD than others avoiding in front of the NPC. Thus, more subjects prefer to avoid in front of the NPC under these conditions (88%, 86%, 78%, 69% of all). But the preference weakens and disappears at 150° and 180° intrusion angles due to the decrease of MLD. In standing NPC experiments, significant left-right preference is not found in pedestrians’ avoidance strategies (right: 46%, left: 54%). This article quantitatively analyses the difference between the influence of fixed and movement NPC on pedestrians’ avoidance strategies. The mechanism of pedestrian’s avoidance behavior is obtained by analyzing characteristic parameters, which is helpful to adjust pedestrian avoidance prediction models and design humanoid robots.

Highlights

  • In daily life, we will encounter pedestrians in two states, standing or moving

  • This paper mainly studies the differences of the characteristic points (Start turning, maximum lateral offset distance (MLD)) between moving experiments and standing experiments

  • In the moving NPC experiments, the start avoidance point has a strong correlation with the intrusion angle

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We will encounter pedestrians in two states, standing or moving. Pedestrians in different states have different influence on the movement of others. In other conditions when avoiding a moving pedestrian, the variation of crossing angle would influence the avoiding distance [7].The above research results indicate that different obstacles have different impact ranges on pedestrians. Baxter et al [10] study how fixed and extended obstacles with different positions and rotation angles affect the pedestrian’s avoidance behavior. They find that when the obstacle rotation angles are 45◦ and 135◦, pedestrians have a significant preference of avoiding from left or right side. The physics engine in Unity can accurately set fixed dynamic parameters of pedestrians, so as to solve the problem of constantly changing dynamic parameters of participants in reality, which is helpful for in-depth analyses of the pedestrians’ avoidance behavior.

Experimental setup
Participants
Procedure
Experiment results
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.