Abstract

Membrane filter samples have been loaded with controlled amounts of fibers, and the samples prepared for counting by phase contrast optical microscopy. Samples have been counted by an automated image analyzer and by experienced fiber counters in three laboratories. The counts show a bias in the estimation of fiber concentration which is related to the number of fibers per unit surface area of the filter sample. Generally, the form of the bias is toward underestimates at very high densities and overestimates at low densitites. The overestimates at low densities are attributed to some extent to counts of background features of the filter as fibers. However, there were also indications that if counters do not record background counts then they are likely to produce underestimates at low densities. The underestimates at high densities are attributed to the difficulties caused by the large number of fibers in each field. The recommendation from these findings is that sample volumes should be selected so as to ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.