Abstract
Csaba's (2016, this issue) view that Voyer, Kastanakis, and Rhode (2016, this issue) offers an incomplete perspective on cultural reciprocal identity co-creation misinterprets the actual aim and scope of the article. We agree with Csaba that cultures should not be stereotyped and equated to countries or solely studied from an individualism - collectivism standpoint. However, we argue that his views are partial and mainly reflect a constructivist epistemological perspective. We conclude that Voyer et al. (2016, this issue) offer an open, flexible and comprehensive framework on reciprocal identity-co-creation, which is multi-epistemological and as such reconciles positivist and constructivist perspectives on the topic of reciprocal identity co-creation across cultures. Future research should improve our knowledge on this domain, from both a constructivist and positivist point of view.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
