The importance of data presentation regarding gingival crevicular fluid myeloperoxidase and elastase-like activity in periodontal disease and health status.

Abstract

The enzymatic profile of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) is being analyzed with increasing interest, but related studies lack a general consensus on most methodological points, including the appropriate mode of data presentation. GCF myeloperoxidase (MPO) and elastase-like activity (ELA) levels were spectrophotometrically determined on a total of 60 subjects who were divided into three equal subgroups as early-onset periodontitis (EOP), adult periodontitis (AP), and healthy. GCF enzyme levels were calculated and evaluated both as total enzyme activity and enzyme concentration. The correlations between these GCF enzymes and clinical periodontal status were also analyzed. With both modes of data presentation, the results regarding MPO activity were consistent. When presented either as total MPO activity or MPO concentration, the periodontally healthy group showed significantly lower MPO activity than the two patient groups (P<0.05). However, two modes of data presentation did not match when GCF ELA was concerned. When data were reported as total ELA, the healthy group exhibited lower enzyme activity (0.02 +/- 0.001 U) than EOP (0.04 +/- 0.01 U) and AP (0.06 +/- 0.02 U) groups; but when reported as concentration, the highest ELA levels were seen in the healthy group (221 +/- 31.53 nmol/min/ml), followed by AP (98.63 +/- 23.03 nmol/min/ml) and EOP (70.49 +/- 12.02 nmol/min/ml) (P<0.05). A strong-positive and significant correlation existed between GCF MPO and ELA. Correlations with clinical parameters were mostly observed with total activities. The findings of the present study confirm the relationship between GCF ELA and MPO activity and periodontal disease and also support the functional relativity between the two enzymes. Furthermore, based on these findings, it can be suggested that data presentation by use of total activity seems to be more sensitive in both the reflection of the actual enzymatic profile of GCF and also the existing clinical periodontal status. For each GCF component, the validity of different modes of data presentation should be considered.