Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper concurs with Davidson-Methot's assertion of the importance of outcome data in RTC program planning and evaluation. However, it seeks to add to his discussion. Specifically, it contends that the elaboration of the rationale for selection of particular indicators is as important as elaboration of the rationale for collecting data in the first place. It is true that calibration of instruments is extremely important to determine precise direction, with the ultimate goal of reaching the correct destination. Nevertheless, knowledge of whether or not one has achieved the desired goal is also contingent on the nature of the data used for calibration. We believe that the most effective program evaluations incorporate multiple components, including objective and subjective indicators, as well as positive and negative indicators. The inclusion of life satisfaction ratings as a part of a comprehensive RTC program evaluation offers unique information for the benefit of agencies in their journeys to ensure quality control.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
