Abstract

BackgroundRheumatologists increasingly perform ultrasound (US) imaging to aid diagnosis and management decisions. There is a need to determine the role of US in facilitating early diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis. This study describes the impact of US use by rheumatologists on diagnosis and management of inflammatory arthritis in routine UK clinical practice.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study in four secondary care rheumatology clinics, each with one consultant who routinely used US and one who did not. Consenting patients aged > 18, newly referred with suspected inflammatory arthritis were included. Data were collected both retrospectively from medical records and via a prospectively-completed physician questionnaire on US use. Analyses were stratified by US/non-US groups and by sub-population of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-diagnosed patients.Results258 patients were included; 134 US and 124 non-US. 42% (56/134) of US and 47% (58/124) of non-US were diagnosed with RA. Results described for US and non-US cohorts, respectively as follows. The proportion of patients diagnosed at their first clinic visit was 37% vs 19% overall (p = 0.004) and 41% vs 19% in RA-diagnosed patients (p = 0.01). The median time to diagnosis (months) was 0.85 vs 2.00 (overall, p = 0.0046) and 0.23 vs 1.38 (RA-diagnosed, p = 0.0016). Median time (months) to initiation on a DMARD (where initiated) was 0.62 vs 1.41 (overall, p = 0.0048) and 0.46 vs 1.81 (RA-diagnosed, p = 0.0007).ConclusionIn patients with suspected inflammatory arthritis, routine US use in newly referred patients seems to be associated with significantly earlier diagnosis and DMARD initiation.

Highlights

  • Rheumatologists increasingly perform ultrasound (US) imaging to aid diagnosis and management decisions

  • In patients with suspected inflammatory arthritis, routine US use in newly referred patients seems to be associated with significantly earlier diagnosis and DMARD initiation

  • The proportion of patients receiving a diagnosis of an inflammatory arthritis during the study period was 62% (83/134) in the US group and 65% (81/124) in the nonUS group. 42% (56/134) of patients in the US group compared to 47% (58/124) in the non-US group were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rheumatologists increasingly perform ultrasound (US) imaging to aid diagnosis and management decisions. This study describes the impact of US use by rheumatologists on diagnosis and management of inflammatory arthritis in routine UK clinical practice. It is widely accepted that early detection of persistent synovitis and initiation of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDS) in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is of critical importance [1, 2]. There is still need to clarify the role of US imaging in the Ultrasonography and MRI have consistently been shown to be more sensitive than clinical examination in detecting synovitis and predicting progression to persistent arthritis or RA [6, 7]. The aim of this study was to describe the impact of rheumatologist-performed US on the diagnosis and management of patients with early inflammatory arthritis in routine clinical practice. Our objectives were to compare 1) the time from first visit to treatment initiation (DMARDS) and 2) the time from first visit to formal diagnosis between patients with and without rheumatologist-performed US assessment; both overall and in a sub-population of patients with a final diagnosis of RA

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.