Abstract
Much of the literature on group lending focuses on its high repayment rates rather than its goal of promoting borrower welfare. Most studies that attempt to measure the impact of group lending neglect the issues of self-selection and endogenous program placement, thus leading to biased estimates of impact. One reason for this neglect is the lack of data that would allow for identification of impact. This paper surmounts these problems by using data from a quasi-experiment conducted in Northeast Thailand in 1995–1996. Program participants were identified in six control villages 1 year prior to receiving loans. Surveys were then conducted of these “control” members, “treatment” members in eight older program villages, and nonmembers in both types of village. This survey design allows for straightforward estimation of impact. The results indicate that program loans are having little impact although “naive” estimates of impact that fail to account for self-selection and endogenous program placement significantly overestimate impact.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
